Resource Logo

Hello, you are using an old browser that's unsafe and no longer supported. Please consider updating your browser to a newer version, or downloading a modern browser.

Receive Updates
Resource Arrow Back to all
Date: March 18, 2019
Category: Real Estate

In 3 Points: Public and Private Real Estate Values Remain on Different Paths

One’s from Venus, the other Mars. Commercial real estate is bifurcated into two universes with buyers and sellers working from diametrically different data sets. The result is a vast spread in asset values, which makes your search for a late-cycle “safe haven” more challenging. Pricing discrepancies across public and private markets have grown wider and lasted longer than if capital flowed more freely between the two. Instead, you must make sense of an expensive private market experiencing outsized demand from record capital flows and a public market trading at a premium on the heels of a recent “yield grab” that proliferated through everything from Exxon Mobile to Phillip Morris International. The question remains, “which is right?”

Understanding public market valuation

Public real estate markets trade on next year’s net asset value (NAV), which is usually a premium to current NAV coming out of a downturn and usually a discount to NAV when moving later into the cycle. In today’s late-cycle environment, we believe that public REITs are fairly valued at roughly a 2-to-5 percent discount to NAV. Yet, billions piled into the public markets this year as rates plummeted and mega pension funds rebalanced. While this glut of demand temporarily inflated values, we believe public market was efficient in the long run – and should soon adjust (remember this to guard against your frequent, market-driven impulses).

Yet, it’s important to note that only core assets like retail, multifamily, hotel, and industrial trade on NAV. Non-core or alternative assets like healthcare and net lease have less private equity alternatives and will perpetually trade at varying levels above NAV in the public markets.

Public markets historically send signals to private markets

Over the last three decades, REITs have traded at a two percent premium to Green Street’s assessment of NAV.1 Now, with many sectors trading at steeper-than-normal discounts, is the public market sending unusually pessimistic signals about where it thinks some real estate sectors will be priced a year from now? Perhaps, but conversely, industrial continues to price at a premium to NAV, meaning there may be an even longer runaway for growth.

History highlights that public market signals have been helpful in forecasting private market returns. Consider this: property prices have almost always appreciated in the 12 months after listed REITs traded at a premium – 96 percent of the time since 1998! It works the other way as well – with property prices declining on average by two percent following periods when public REITs traded at discounts.1

We currently sit in an environment of robust private market demand across core sectors. Leveraging historical patterns, inflows focused on high NAV-premium sectors may make sense, while other capital flows have looked out of place. Office, for instance, is flush with cash, perhaps because it’s easier to buy scale in core, but the public markets currently offer a far cheaper access point to this heavily-discounted sector.

Even if private market investors never purchase a REIT, they may want to monitor public market valuations to find a divergence between perceived and real risk. That’s the time to act.

Perfect example of the disconnect: core Manhattan office

We’ve laid the foundation for the office paradigm, so let’s dig a bit deeper. Public REITs that own Manhattan office properties are trading at substantial discounts to private market values – office overall is trading at nearly a 14 percent discount to NAV!

Net effective rent growth and cash leasing spreads in Manhattan office have declined as Class A asking rents have flatlined amidst an influx of new supply.2

Evolving tenant preferences are also at odds with the older floorplans prevalent in Manhattan. Tech tenants and co-working firms are mandating open floor plans and floor-to-ceiling windows, an onerous capital expenditure requirement that stifles growth. Co-working tenants, especially WeWork, are exploding in Manhattan, which yields a dilemma beyond cap-ex. This tenant profile broadly consists of corporate overflow, consultancies, and start-ups, which are typically the first to fold in a Recession. Now, not only are these property owners up against it with higher upfront costs, but vacancy rates may jump at the sign of a downturn.

The result is reduced cash flow to the landlord, making it difficult to justify those high valuations, even if it’s easier to deploy mass capital in the private markets. We believe this formula isn’t the best way to achieve late-cycle value.

Who’s right?

Historically, the private market is best served following the public market’s lead. Private market values can be distorted in the short-term by transaction or appraisal lag or even appraisal error. Over time, as the investment horizon lengthens, private markets tend to gravitate towards public markets. In the search for a “safe haven”, public market values may offer a truer look at future investment value.

1 Green Street Advisors. Remarkable Signals From the Listed Market. 7/10/18.

2 J.P. Morgan Asset Management Overview. 12/31/18.

Resource Securities LLC, Member FINRA/SIPC.

Resource has two interval funds that are distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc. (ALPS Distributors, Inc. 1290 Broadway, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80203). Resource Alternative Advisor, LLC, Resource Real Estate, LLC, their affiliates, and ALPS Distributors, Inc. are not affiliated. In addition, Resource Real Estate, LLC is also the sponsor of several non-traded REITS.

The information contained herein is intended to be used for educational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to purchase securities. Such offers or solicitations can only be made by means of a prospectus. Prior to making any investment decision, you should read the applicable prospectus carefully and consider the risks, charges, expenses and other important information described therein.

With respect to the non-traded REITs, neither the Attorney General of the State of New York nor any other state regulators have passed on or endorsed the merits of the products. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. Investing in non-traded REITS involves a high degree of risk and uncertainties which should be carefully considered when making an investment decision. If any of the risks were to occur, the value of your investment may decline, and you could lose some or all of your investment. Some of these risks related to available Resource products may include the following: no public market exists for the investment and liquidity by a specified date is not guaranteed; the purchase price of your investment may not reflect the underlying value of the security; limited operating history for the program; no investments identified to acquire with the equity raised; dependence on an external advisor to select investments and to conduct operations; payment of substantial fees to the advisor that increase the risk investors will not earn a profit on their investment; conflicts of interest; the use of leverage to acquire investments; restrictions on the ownership and transferability of an investment; distributions may be sourced from offering proceeds or borrowings.

The value of your investments may decline, and you could lose some or all of your investment. The prospectus can be obtained by contacting your financial advisor or by visiting our website at

Receive Updates

* These fields are required.

Emails will only be sent to financial advisors. If you are not a financial advisor, please visit our website often for the latest educational content.